Select Research Publications

On this page:

Research Appendix

1 Ramscar, M. (under review) Wittgenstein and the psychological utility of concepts.

2 Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K. & Thorpe, K. (under review) Feature-Label-Order Effects and their implications for symbolic learning.

3 Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2009) No representation without taxation: The costs and benefits of learning to conceptualize the environment. 2nd International Analogy Conference, Sophia, Bulgaria.

4 Ramscar, M., Matlock, T., & Dye, M. (in press) Running down the clock: the role of expectation in our understanding of time and motion. Language and Cognitive Processes.

5 Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & Yarlett, D. (under review) Language as prediction.

6 MacDonald, S and Ramscar, M (2001). Testing the Distributional Hypothesis: The Influence of Context on Judgments of Semantic Similarity. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of Edinburgh.

7 Yarlett, D., Ramscar, M & Dye, M. (under review) Language learning through similarity-based generalization.

8 Ramscar, M.J.A. and Yarlett, D.G. (2003) Grounding Semantics in Analogical Processing: An Environmental Approach. Cognitive Science, 27, 41-71.

9 Ramscar, M.J.A. (2002) The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense doesn't require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45(2), 45-94.

10 Ramscar, M.J.A. & Yarlett, D. (2007) Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition Cognitive Science, 31, 927-960.

11 Ramscar, M.J.A. & Gitcho, N. (2007). Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood. Trends In Cognitive Science, 11(7), 274-279.

12 Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (under review) Learning Language from the Input: Why innate constraints aren't needed in compounding.

13 Ramscar, M. & Dye, M. (under review) Expectation and error distribution in language learning: the curious absence of "mouses" in adult speech.

14 Thompson-Schill, S., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, M. (2009) Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 8(5).

15 Ramscar, M., Dye, M., Witten, J., & Klein, J. (under review) Two routes to cognitive flexibility: Learning and response conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task.

16 Ramscar, M., Holmes, K., Dye, M., Kirkham, N., & Gitcho, N. (under review) The roles of cognitive control and language in the development of false belief understanding.

17 Alloway, T.P., Corley, M., & Ramscar, M.J.A. (2006). Seeing ahead: Experience and language in spatial perspective. Memory and Cognition, 34, 380-386.

18 Matlock, T, Ramscar, M.J.A., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). The experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655-664.

19 Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M.J.A. (2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-188.

20 Ramscar, M., Boroditsky, L., & Matlock, T. (in press). Time, motion and meaning: the experiential basis of abstract thought. In Language is spatial, not special: Using space for language and memory. L. Smith, K. Mix, & M. Gasser (Eds.), Spatial Foundations of Cognition and Language. Oxford University Press.

21 St. Clair, M., Monahan, P., & Ramscar, M. (2009) Relationships between Language Structure and Language Learning: The Suffixing Preference and Grammatical Categorization. Cognitive Science. 33(7): 1317-1329.

22 Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2009) Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order of acquisition affects what gets learned. Proceedings of the 31st Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

23 Bannard, C. & Ramscar, M. (2007). Reading time evidence for storage of frequent multiwordsequences. Proceedings of Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing 2007, Turku, Finland.

24 Davidenko, N., & Ramscar, M. (2003) Age and gender: similarly cued from silhouetted face profiles. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA.

25 Davidenko, N., Remus, D., Ramscar, M., & Grill-Spector, K. (2008). Stronger face-selective responses to typical versus distinctive faces when stimulus variability is controlled. Journal of Vision, 8(6), 531.

26 Davidenko, N., & Ramscar, M. (2005). The distinctiveness effect reconsidered: Poorer recognition of distinctive face silhouettes. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 981.

27 Ramscar, M. (2003) The past-tense debate: exocentric form versus the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 107-8.